If you take an honest look around the fantasy sports landscape, you will be left shaking your head and wondering the same thing I am: What’s wrong?
My mentor told me a couple years ago, “The big money has already been made in this business.”
I don’t need to bore you with stats and trends, and I really don’t care what overpriced studies say – the number of consumers is way down. The number of companies showing growth is down. Companies are going out of business. Major media companies are convinced they can’t win with sports, let alone fantasy sports. Everyone is looking for distribution. This has become a fragile marketplace.
Don’t believe me?
Do your own simple research. You don’t need to have a ComScore account to track it – you can get a very good sense of the health of this industry by doing a simple search/comparison on Compete.com.
I first compared a few content sites that I visit frequently: FootballGuys.com, RotoWire.com, and RotoWorld.com. The results were staggering – See chart below
** You must have over 5K unique visitors to be listed in any of the data points shown below.
So quick review:
FootballGuys: 60,269 Unique Visitors: Yearly Change (-4.31%)
RotoWire: 32,203 Unique Visitors: Yearly Change (-33.75%)
RotoWorld: 321,378 Unique Visitors: Yearly Change (-1.51%)
After looking at this — I kept digging. After all, the three sites above are highly regarded as three of my favorites in the fantasy sports marketplace.
FFToday: 25,530 Unique Visitors: Yearly Change (-23.67%)
TheHuddle: 17,883 Unique Visitors: Yearly Change (-24.59%)
FantasyFootballCafe: 7,180 Unique Visitors: Yearly Change (-56.36%)
FootballDieHards: 9,592 Unique Visitors: Yearly Change (-3.14%)
MockDraftCentral: 12,115 Unique Visitors: Yearly Change (-21.62%)
I then expanded my criteria to niche fantasy game providers.
MyFantasyLeague: 153,222 Unique Visitors: Yearly Change (-15.48%)
RTSports: 92,346 Unique Visitors: Yearly Change (+2.54%)
Fantrax: 15,534 Unique Visitors: Yearly Change (-1.26%)
Head2Head: 12,643 Unique Visitors: Yearly Change (-28.64%)
RapidDraft: 5,677 Unique Visitors: Yearly Change (-1.22%)
I decided that wasn’t enough of a sample size – and expanded to fantasy baseball websites:
BaseballHQ: 6,235 Unique Visitors: Yearly Change (-44.30%)
BaseballProspectus: 38,133 Unique Visitors: Yearly Change (-31.66%)
Okay — I think we have enough data points to prove a point. However, let me first say that I have no proof that these numbers are accurate. I’m simply using Compete.com to provide the data. I know it’s not 100% accurate, but I’d bet if I put the same companies into ComScore – the same chapter to this story would be written.
I guess I’d be amiss if I didn’t point out the number of companies who have closed, shutdown, etc. Hell, that is what basically gave me the time to do this quick study.
Fanball.com – Been in business since 1993. Approx. 95K unique visitors. Status: CLOSED
AOL Fanhouse – Recently “sold” all of its inventory to SportingNews. At it’s height – AOL’s sports property had over 5M uniques. Still, AOL decided they could not win in sports.
Sporting News – Announced that they would no longer offer fantasy sports games in 2010.
OpenSports – Raised millions of dollars – never got traction despite distribution outlet with Fox Sports.
Despite lots of money, a national radio audience, massive bookstore distribution, staggering numbers of users, and longevity – they could not survive.
Think about it.
Before I continue to paint a doom & gloom scenario, let’s give credit where credit is due — there are a few content sites who have really shown growth in these difficult times:
FFToolBox.com: 144,602 Unique Visitors: Yearly Change (+2.43%)
FantasyFootball.com: 24,536 Unique Visitors: Yearly Change (+3.31%)
FantasySharks.com: 35,431 Unique Visitors: Yearly Change (+14.32%)
KFFL.com: 96,106 Unique Visitors: Yearly Change (+28.95%)
FantasyGuru.com: 18,489 Unique Visitors: Yearly Change (+10.42%)
So what is my hypothesis based on this less then ideal data structure?
Basically, the premium content companies are getting slaughtered (and that’s putting it nicely). I had a conversation that sparked this research with one of my buddies and his observation was, “there are simply less people playing fantasy sports.” I tend to agree. The plethora of free fantasy sports information is stunning. Years ago a user would pay to get “insider” data, a draft kit and a magazine or two. These days, a novice user can walk into a draft with a draft tool, an iPhone application filled with draft rankings, tons of cheatsheets compiled in whatever scoring format he/she chooses and numerous other pieces of information – all for free!
I also believe that news/content sites are getting crushed by Twitter. No disrespect to anyone, but I used to visit MLBTradeRumors.com on a daily basis. Now I just rely on my Twitter aggregation feed to tell me the latest in the world of sports/fantasy sports. It breaks there and on my hand held device faster then any site can write it up. I don’t need to visit the web any longer to get that critical data. Sorry Tim. You do an amazing job at MLBTR.
What was once considered a thriving business sector has become frail, stagnated and tepid. And I’m being “nice” using those words. Personally, I believe better adjectives to define fantasy sports companies are; lifeless, sterile and annoying.
If you take an honest look around the space, what you will see is a continued lack of innovation. Seriously, when was the last time you saw something “fresh”? Most of what you see is a slightly modified version of the original by another company who wants to take away some market share. This simply doesn’t work.
Listen, you can’t win re-creating the wheel.
Most of the time, a fresh, new, innovative idea that has distribution and can create it’s own market share will win. Be the first mover on something fresh and new. It’s not about what new bells & whistles you have included in the product. It’s not about beating them on prize payout percentage. All you are doing is setting up everyone else to fail.
Perfect example of this — the daily fantasy games space.
A couple companies roll out a game that features daily contests. Games are somewhat successful, easy to play, engaging – they become a hot commodity. Next thing you know – there is upwards of 15 companies now offering the same game. What did they do differently? Basically nothing. They added some “factors”, “bells & whistles” and “upgraded graphics.” They may have changed some game mechanics but basically they were all the same. So what happens? The guys that got out early are maintaining their market share despite the new entries into the space, so the rookies have to get desperate. So what do they do? Raise their prize payouts. So now you have 15+ companies all competing against each other for prize payout when the margins in this game are too slim to begin with. I’ve seen payouts as high as 94%. Listen to me — I don’t care what anyone says — you are NOT making any money on a 6% rake. You aren’t making any money on a 10% rake. You THINK you are — but you aren’t and you will not be successful long-term. You have to cover server costs, credit card processing fees, staffing fees. You are not going to win by offering the lowest “rake”. You simply can’t scale big enough. It will take MILLIONS of eyeballs and you can’t get there. You don’t have four letters in your domain and you have no massive distribution point – i.e. television.
The other key problem is a lack of distribution outlets.
The big boys probably aren’t interested in helping you figure out a way to get rich. Let’s be honest. It’s not like you can walk into ESPN and say, “Hey, my game is really cool. It would REALLY help ESPN from a marketing and engagement standpoint. Just think about it — my game would help you guys bring customers back every day that you can sell ads to.” Dude – they don’t need you for engagement or your idea. Pay them LOTS of money — you might get them to put the game on the site. Even then — hold your breath. It won’t be pretty, odds are it won’t be successful and your board will be really upset that you made a dumb decision.
The fact remains, you can’t market a pay-to-play content portal or fantasy game on a free-to-play outlet. Your cost per customer acquisition will be way too high to translate into worthwhile results and aside from a branding exercise – I’m not sure what you will get out of it. I guess good PR – but that’s only worth what you are able to leverage out of it.
Don’t even get me started on the High Stakes fantasy space – that’s an entirely different discussion.
I have a few distinct conclusions based on all of this:
1. I can foresee a day (rather quickly) when ESPN, NBC, YAHOO, NFL and MLB all own even more dominant positions in the the industry, and it’s too difficult to compete with them. Small “mom & pops” with considerable upside will be non-existent.
2. Nobody is investing in fantasy sports. The first question that all savvy investors want to know is “can it scale?” Fantasy doesn’t scale. It’s a declining marketplace and if you are going to invest big money in the space, you want something that has a chance of huge returns. Fantasy does not have that.
3. I’m not going to say you can’t make a living in this space. Plenty of you reading this make a solid living doing what you want to do. That’s exceptional. Don’t let this take away from that. In fact, if you are happy doing what you love – there is A LOT to be said about that.
4. Sell, Sell, Sell. If somebody sniffs at your business and offers you something that will allow you to be comfortable for quite a few years, you should do it. Don’t think twice – get out. Take your exit and move on. Some of the smartest people in our industry got out a few years back and have lots of money to keep them comfortable for a long time. I’m doubtful you will see that again in this space so take any advantage you have now for a quick exit.
5. Our industry is at a cross-roads. We all love and appreciate the opportunity to live the “fantasy dream.” However, it’s really time to go back to the drawing board and ask yourself “What’s Next?”…before it’s too late.
Lastly, I don’t want everything above to be construed as me being negative based on my most recent departure from Fanball. Certainly I have had some time to reflect and now it’s time to move on. What I wanted to do was reflect on the state of the industry in a very high-level way. It’s not exact science and some of the numbers above may be way off internal analytics at some companies.
Let me reiterate, I know all the numbers above are not 100% accurate. In no way am I suggesting that I based my thoughts on these numbers. They only provided framework to what I have been sensing for some time. They certainly are thought provoking and insightful, but I know that all of these “open source” analytic systems have flaws. So keep that in mind.
It doesn’t change my mind.
After all, everyone is entitled to their own opinion.